Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Buletin Peternakan Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi EKONOMIS : Journal of Economics and Business J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains) Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam JAS (Jurnal Agri Sains) Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan
Bagus Pramusintho
Faculty Of Animal Husbandry, Jambi University, Jambi, 36361, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Buletin Peternakan

 1 
THE COMPARISON OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ON CATTLE BREEDING BUSINESS BETWEEN SHARE-BEEF CATTLE MODEL AND FARMER-OWN BEEF CATTLE MODEL AT MUARO JAMBI REGENCY, JAMBI PROVINCE Bagus Pramusintho; Slamet Hartono; Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto; Any Suryantini
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.18427

Abstract

The lack of capital for investment and limited access for small beef cattle farming to obtain credit from financial institution have contributed to the occurrence of share-beef cattle in rural areas. Through share-beef cattle pattern, the farmers (tenant) can rent livestock from other parties (individual nor government) within a share-beef cattle contract agreement. The purposes of this study were to determine the technical efficiency and the factors which influence the inefficiency from 108 small beef cattlebreeding, which consists of 59 farming operated by owner and 49 operated by tenant.  The unit samples were selected by snowball sampling method and analysed by Stochastic Frontier Production. Our study showed that the average technical efficiency of beef cattle breeding operated by owner was at 0.73, otherwise operated by tenant was at 0.790. The inefficiency of beef cattle breeding operated by owner has negatively corresponded to the number of cows, the farmer age, the age of cow and the application of artificial insemination (IA), but positively corresponded to allocation of family labour and level of farmer education. The inefficiency of beef cattle breeding operated by a tenant has negatively corresponded to the application of artificial insemination (AI). Specific conclusion of the study was the technical efficiency level of small beef cattle breeding was not only affected by the ownership of beef cattle but also by the pattern of share-beef cattle.  The share-beef cattle based on share income(50:50) may improve the value of technical efficiency compared to share-beef cattle based on share in-kind (share-beef cattle revolving cow or share-beef cattle revolving calf).
Household Behavior and Response to the Participative Institutional Model for the Program of Handling Drainage of Productive Cows Ardi Novra; Bagus Pramusintho
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i4.44968

Abstract

The research survey aimed to observe the households behavior and response to the participatory institution model of the preventing of the productive cows exploitation. The sample technique to select of the domestic cattle farmer (DCF) as the unit of analysis using the multiple stages cluster sampling and then sample allocation was equal for three districts. Structural equation model consisted of 5 behavior equations drawn up from the 5 endogenous and 13 exogenous variables. The research results showed that the rate of release of productive cows about 19.23 percent. The institutional model to handling of the drain at least productive cows have four major components, were members (DCFs), the management, micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and buffer-stock. The household motivation to develop the business scale and maintain the productive heifer shaped by land ownership and livestock scale expected factors. Then both types of motivation were not significantly associated with DCF's motivation to engage in institutional, as the more dominant individual as shaped by the farmer age. The other hand, the confidence level of participatory institutional effectiveness significantly shaped by the perception of institutional and potential release of productive heifer compared the potential release of motivation factors and correlated positively with the economic conditions.
Co-Authors Abdul Latief Abdul Latif Adriani Adriani Afriani H Any Suryantini Ardi Novra Ardi Novra Ardi Novra Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto Fachroerrozi Hoesni, Fachroerrozi Firmansyah Firmansyah Firmansyah Firmansyah Haris Lukman Indra Sulaksana Indra Sulaksana Nurhabibah Nurhabibah Setiawan Setiawan Slamet Hartono Suhessy Syarief Suhessy Syarief, Suhessy Widya Anggraeni Widya Anggraeni Widya Yessy Dwinata S